[{"innerBlocks":[],"name":"core\/freeform","postId":126118,"blockType":{"name":"core\/freeform","keywords":[],"attributes":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"raw"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"providesContext":[],"usesContext":[],"selectors":[],"supports":{"className":false,"customClassName":false,"reusable":false},"styles":[],"variations":[],"apiVersion":3,"title":"Classic","description":"Use the classic WordPress editor.","category":"text"},"originalContent":"Developing standards for healthcare is nothing new\u2014and that evolution is continuing in modern-day healthcare standards, in particular, the proposed 2019 Quality Payment Program Year Three changes under MACRA.

Since its introduction in 2015, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, or MACRA, has focused on two main areas in healthcare: quality and cost.

With the 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposal, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is taking a major evolutionary step toward directly addressing the cost part of the patient care equation.

The proposal also sets out standards for how providers apply for Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) adjustments, implement interoperability, qualify for reimbursement and submit data for review.

Here are five areas where the 2019 rule poses the most significant changes for hospitals and practices:

More emphasis on cost<\/b>
In 2019, the cost performance category is scheduled to increase to 15 percent of the overall MIPS score, up from 10 percent in 2018. Going forward, the cost category could increase to as high as 30 percent by 2022.

CMS is also adding eight episode-based measures to the cost performance category, five related to procedures like knee arthroplasty, routine cataract removal with IOL implantation, and screening\/surveillance colonoscopy, and three others related to acute inpatient episodes including intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, and simple pneumonia with hospitalization.

All cost performance data is collected by CMS automatically through claims; clinicians and administrative staff will not have to take any additional steps to provide it.

Introduction of \u2018promoting interoperability\u2019<\/b>
Another proposal for 2019 is changing the name of the Advancing Care Information category to Promoting Interoperability, or PI, but the shift in this category is more than just a new title.

Under the proposal, providers must bring their electronic health record systems up to 2015 Edition Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) standards. In addition, the \u201cbase score\u201d concept would be removed, and more stringent benchmarks for what meets the CMS requirements for interoperability would make it more difficult to earn points under MIPS.

This change represents a complete overhaul of Meaningful Use (MU), with some Stage 3 measures being eliminated and others being introduced for 2019.

Expanding who is qualified for reimbursement\u2014and who\u2019s exempt from reporting<\/b>
A number of practitioners are being added to the CMS list of providers who could qualify for reimbursement. The list includes physical therapists, occupational therapists, clinical social workers, and clinical psychologists.

The 2019 proposal also expands the low-volume threshold\u2014that is, the number of patients or amount of income that sets the benchmarks for MIPS reporting\u2014to exempt practices that deliver 200 or fewer covered professional services under the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS).

Reducing the length of reporting<\/b>
After more than 50 provider groups petitioned CMS to cut the reporting period from a full calendar year to 90 days, the agency responded by including that change in the 2019 proposal.

The decision aligns with CMS\u2019s stated goal of \u201cprioritizing patients over paperwork,\u201d and makes it easier for administrative staff to accomplish their reporting requirements.

Addressing the opioid crisis<\/b>
While this proposal is connected to the new PI standards, it\u2019s worth taking a closer look at how CMS is building on its existing requirements for electronic prescribing of controlled substances to address the ongoing opioid crisis.

New for 2019, providers would be required to have a CEHRT that can query a patient\u2019s prescription history through a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, and to incorporate an opioid treatment agreement between the patient and provider into the CEHRT. CMS is also seeking clinician feedback on what the treatment agreement might include \u2014 so far, the agency says it\u2019s not recommending a standardized document or defining the requirements for what could qualify as a treatment agreement.

How to comment and find more information<\/b>
As required under MACRA, CMS is accepting public comments via the Federal Register on the 2019 proposal through Sept. 10, with the final rule expected in November and the new standards going into effect on Jan. 1, 2019. CMS has also created a Quality Payment Program website providing detailed information about the changes from 2017 to 2018, and links to the 2019 proposed rule and resource library.","saveContent":"Developing standards for healthcare is nothing new\u2014and that evolution is continuing in modern-day healthcare standards, in particular, the proposed 2019 Quality Payment Program Year Three changes under MACRA.

Since its introduction in 2015, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, or MACRA, has focused on two main areas in healthcare: quality and cost.

With the 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposal, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is taking a major evolutionary step toward directly addressing the cost part of the patient care equation.

The proposal also sets out standards for how providers apply for Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) adjustments, implement interoperability, qualify for reimbursement and submit data for review.

Here are five areas where the 2019 rule poses the most significant changes for hospitals and practices:

More emphasis on cost<\/b>
In 2019, the cost performance category is scheduled to increase to 15 percent of the overall MIPS score, up from 10 percent in 2018. Going forward, the cost category could increase to as high as 30 percent by 2022.

CMS is also adding eight episode-based measures to the cost performance category, five related to procedures like knee arthroplasty, routine cataract removal with IOL implantation, and screening\/surveillance colonoscopy, and three others related to acute inpatient episodes including intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, and simple pneumonia with hospitalization.

All cost performance data is collected by CMS automatically through claims; clinicians and administrative staff will not have to take any additional steps to provide it.

Introduction of \u2018promoting interoperability\u2019<\/b>
Another proposal for 2019 is changing the name of the Advancing Care Information category to Promoting Interoperability, or PI, but the shift in this category is more than just a new title.

Under the proposal, providers must bring their electronic health record systems up to 2015 Edition Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) standards. In addition, the \u201cbase score\u201d concept would be removed, and more stringent benchmarks for what meets the CMS requirements for interoperability would make it more difficult to earn points under MIPS.

This change represents a complete overhaul of Meaningful Use (MU), with some Stage 3 measures being eliminated and others being introduced for 2019.

Expanding who is qualified for reimbursement\u2014and who\u2019s exempt from reporting<\/b>
A number of practitioners are being added to the CMS list of providers who could qualify for reimbursement. The list includes physical therapists, occupational therapists, clinical social workers, and clinical psychologists.

The 2019 proposal also expands the low-volume threshold\u2014that is, the number of patients or amount of income that sets the benchmarks for MIPS reporting\u2014to exempt practices that deliver 200 or fewer covered professional services under the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS).

Reducing the length of reporting<\/b>
After more than 50 provider groups petitioned CMS to cut the reporting period from a full calendar year to 90 days, the agency responded by including that change in the 2019 proposal.

The decision aligns with CMS\u2019s stated goal of \u201cprioritizing patients over paperwork,\u201d and makes it easier for administrative staff to accomplish their reporting requirements.

Addressing the opioid crisis<\/b>
While this proposal is connected to the new PI standards, it\u2019s worth taking a closer look at how CMS is building on its existing requirements for electronic prescribing of controlled substances to address the ongoing opioid crisis.

New for 2019, providers would be required to have a CEHRT that can query a patient\u2019s prescription history through a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, and to incorporate an opioid treatment agreement between the patient and provider into the CEHRT. CMS is also seeking clinician feedback on what the treatment agreement might include \u2014 so far, the agency says it\u2019s not recommending a standardized document or defining the requirements for what could qualify as a treatment agreement.

How to comment and find more information<\/b>
As required under MACRA, CMS is accepting public comments via the Federal Register on the 2019 proposal through Sept. 10, with the final rule expected in November and the new standards going into effect on Jan. 1, 2019. CMS has also created a Quality Payment Program website providing detailed information about the changes from 2017 to 2018, and links to the 2019 proposed rule and resource library.","order":0,"get_parent":{},"attributes":[],"attributesType":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"raw"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"dynamicContent":""}]

What the proposed 2019 MACRA changes mean for providers

More for you