[{"innerBlocks":[],"name":"core\/freeform","postId":3599,"blockType":{"name":"core\/freeform","keywords":[],"attributes":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"raw"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"providesContext":[],"usesContext":[],"selectors":[],"supports":{"className":false,"customClassName":false,"reusable":false},"styles":[],"variations":[],"apiVersion":3,"title":"Classic","description":"Use the classic WordPress editor.","category":"text"},"originalContent":"Republicans unveiled their long-awaited legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, proposing to phase out key parts of the law over several years as they try to break through a stalemate between moderates and conservatives in their party.

Called the American Health Care Act, House Republicans\u2019 proposal includes a refundable, age-based tax credit to help people buy insurance. It also ends a requirement to have coverage, and would eventually eliminate many taxes used to fund the 2010 law. Other changes, like a wind-down of an expansion of Medicaid, are phased in over a period of years.

It\u2019s not clear whether the proposal can win the support of House conservatives or clear the Senate, where Republicans possess a razor-thin margin and are relying on a fast-track legislation procedure full of limitations. There\u2019s also been little involvement from President Donald Trump, who has eschewed detailed policy proposals in favor of tweets and broad promises about better healthcare for less money.

Yet seven years after Republicans began promising repeal, the proposal is the most comprehensive look yet at how the GOP will approach replacing the health law, which brought coverage to an estimated 20 million people. Republicans have blamed the ACA for rising insurance premiums and high out-of-pocket costs, and criticized its requirement that everyone have health insurance or pay a penalty.

The proposal released Monday night represents an attempt to appease different factions within the party. While conservatives have pushed for full, immediate repeal, one concern among some moderates is that too-sudden changes would toss people out of coverage right away, particularly those in Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor that was expanded under the Affordable Care Act.

\u201cIt looks like they\u2019ve moved toward a better transition period, more flexibilities for the governors and ability for the Medicaid expansion population to have the assurance that they\u2019re not going to be left out in the cold,\u201d said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, (R-WV), who had threatened not to support the proposal if Medicaid wasn\u2019t addressed. \u201cIt\u2019s moving in the right direction.\u201d

House Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement the plan is designed to \u201cdrive down costs, encourage competition and give every American access to quality, affordable health insurance.\u201d

Two House committees will start work on moving it forward on Wednesday. Key provisions include:

Providing an advanceable, refundable tax credit to help buy insurance for individuals, that phases out for people making more than $75,000 ($150,000 for a couple filing jointly). The credit starts at $2,000 per person and grows to $4,000 with age. A family can get as much as $14,000 in total.<\/li><\/ul>
- Immediately ending a requirement that individuals have insurance coverage and another rule that requires some businesses to offer coverage to their workers.<\/li><\/ul>
  - Expanding the allowable size of healthcare savings accounts that can be coupled with high-deductible insurance plans\u2014up to $6,550 for an individual or $13,100 for a family.<\/li><\/ul>
    - Winding down Obamacare\u2019s expansion of Medicaid, changing it to a per-capita system in which states are given a set amount for the number of people in categories including the disabled, elderly, childless adults and pregnant mothers.<\/li><\/ul>
      - Allowing people with pre-existing conditions to buy insurance, but requiring \u201ccontinuous\u201d coverage to discourage people from buying it only when they get sick. Individuals who go uninsured for longer than a set period face 30 percent higher premiums as a penalty.<\/li><\/ul>
        Giving states a $100 billion fund over a decade to help lower-income people afford insurance, and to help stabilize state insurance markets. The fund could be used to help lower patients\u2019 out of pocket costs or to promote access to preventive services. Delaying until 2025, instead of permanently repealing, a tax on high-cost health insurance plans.
        
        There was no estimate of how much the bill will cost or how many people it will cover, creating a risk for Republicans as they move forward. The plan for the proposal is that it would be paid for by eventually repealing Obamacare\u2019s expansion of Medicaid, cutting insurance subsidies and by keeping, but delaying, a tax on high-cost insurance plans.
        
        \u201cYou want to know it\u2019s fiscally responsible,\u201d said Sen. Bill Cassidy, (R-La.). \u201cYou want to know the taxpayer can\u2019t get hosed, without gimmicks, right? And you\u2019d want to know that folks, that President Trump, who said he wants as many people covered, you\u2019d want to see his pledge fulfilled, at a lower cost.\"
        
        It\u2019s not clear whether the measure can win the support of House conservatives, who have demanded a more complete repeal. Earlier drafts prompted stiff criticism from some who complained that concerns over the cost, size and nature of the tax credits weren\u2019t adequately addressed.
        
        And even with the Medicaid provisions, there are other risks. Two Senate Republicans\u2014Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska\u2014oppose plans to defund Planned Parenthood that are included in the bill.
        
        Democrats immediately panned the bill, which the GOP had kept out of sight during its drafting.
        
        \u201cCongressional Republicans are leading a desperate forced march to pass a dangerous bill written in secret which few members of Congress have seen, let alone read,\u201d Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), said in a statement Monday night.
        
        Democrats also argued that people currently covered under Obamacare would be worse off. \u201cThe Republican repeal bill would charge them more money for less care,\u201d representatives Frank Pallone of New Jersey and Richard Neal of Massachusetts said in a statement. They are the top two Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Ways and Means Committee, respectively.","saveContent":"Republicans unveiled their long-awaited legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, proposing to phase out key parts of the law over several years as they try to break through a stalemate between moderates and conservatives in their party.
        
        Called the American Health Care Act, House Republicans\u2019 proposal includes a refundable, age-based tax credit to help people buy insurance. It also ends a requirement to have coverage, and would eventually eliminate many taxes used to fund the 2010 law. Other changes, like a wind-down of an expansion of Medicaid, are phased in over a period of years.
        
        It\u2019s not clear whether the proposal can win the support of House conservatives or clear the Senate, where Republicans possess a razor-thin margin and are relying on a fast-track legislation procedure full of limitations. There\u2019s also been little involvement from President Donald Trump, who has eschewed detailed policy proposals in favor of tweets and broad promises about better healthcare for less money.
        
        Yet seven years after Republicans began promising repeal, the proposal is the most comprehensive look yet at how the GOP will approach replacing the health law, which brought coverage to an estimated 20 million people. Republicans have blamed the ACA for rising insurance premiums and high out-of-pocket costs, and criticized its requirement that everyone have health insurance or pay a penalty.
        
        The proposal released Monday night represents an attempt to appease different factions within the party. While conservatives have pushed for full, immediate repeal, one concern among some moderates is that too-sudden changes would toss people out of coverage right away, particularly those in Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor that was expanded under the Affordable Care Act.
        
        \u201cIt looks like they\u2019ve moved toward a better transition period, more flexibilities for the governors and ability for the Medicaid expansion population to have the assurance that they\u2019re not going to be left out in the cold,\u201d said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, (R-WV), who had threatened not to support the proposal if Medicaid wasn\u2019t addressed. \u201cIt\u2019s moving in the right direction.\u201d
        
        House Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement the plan is designed to \u201cdrive down costs, encourage competition and give every American access to quality, affordable health insurance.\u201d
        
        Two House committees will start work on moving it forward on Wednesday. Key provisions include:
        Providing an advanceable, refundable tax credit to help buy insurance for individuals, that phases out for people making more than $75,000 ($150,000 for a couple filing jointly). The credit starts at $2,000 per person and grows to $4,000 with age. A family can get as much as $14,000 in total.<\/li><\/ul>
        Immediately ending a requirement that individuals have insurance coverage and another rule that requires some businesses to offer coverage to their workers.<\/li><\/ul>
        Expanding the allowable size of healthcare savings accounts that can be coupled with high-deductible insurance plans\u2014up to $6,550 for an individual or $13,100 for a family.<\/li><\/ul>
        Winding down Obamacare\u2019s expansion of Medicaid, changing it to a per-capita system in which states are given a set amount for the number of people in categories including the disabled, elderly, childless adults and pregnant mothers.<\/li><\/ul>
        Allowing people with pre-existing conditions to buy insurance, but requiring \u201ccontinuous\u201d coverage to discourage people from buying it only when they get sick. Individuals who go uninsured for longer than a set period face 30 percent higher premiums as a penalty.<\/li><\/ul>
        Giving states a $100 billion fund over a decade to help lower-income people afford insurance, and to help stabilize state insurance markets. The fund could be used to help lower patients\u2019 out of pocket costs or to promote access to preventive services. Delaying until 2025, instead of permanently repealing, a tax on high-cost health insurance plans.
        
        There was no estimate of how much the bill will cost or how many people it will cover, creating a risk for Republicans as they move forward. The plan for the proposal is that it would be paid for by eventually repealing Obamacare\u2019s expansion of Medicaid, cutting insurance subsidies and by keeping, but delaying, a tax on high-cost insurance plans.
        
        \u201cYou want to know it\u2019s fiscally responsible,\u201d said Sen. Bill Cassidy, (R-La.). \u201cYou want to know the taxpayer can\u2019t get hosed, without gimmicks, right? And you\u2019d want to know that folks, that President Trump, who said he wants as many people covered, you\u2019d want to see his pledge fulfilled, at a lower cost.\"
        
        It\u2019s not clear whether the measure can win the support of House conservatives, who have demanded a more complete repeal. Earlier drafts prompted stiff criticism from some who complained that concerns over the cost, size and nature of the tax credits weren\u2019t adequately addressed.
        
        And even with the Medicaid provisions, there are other risks. Two Senate Republicans\u2014Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska\u2014oppose plans to defund Planned Parenthood that are included in the bill.
        
        Democrats immediately panned the bill, which the GOP had kept out of sight during its drafting.
        
        \u201cCongressional Republicans are leading a desperate forced march to pass a dangerous bill written in secret which few members of Congress have seen, let alone read,\u201d Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), said in a statement Monday night.
        
        Democrats also argued that people currently covered under Obamacare would be worse off. \u201cThe Republican repeal bill would charge them more money for less care,\u201d representatives Frank Pallone of New Jersey and Richard Neal of Massachusetts said in a statement. They are the top two Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Ways and Means Committee, respectively.","order":0,"get_parent":{},"attributes":[],"attributesType":{"content":{"type":"string","source":"raw"},"lock":{"type":"object"}},"dynamicContent":""}]

Republicans unveil health bill to repeal, replace ACA

More for you